ELA app iconELA · Private briefing for Stevan, 30 September 2026

Business plan update: where it stands

Everything from today's session in one place: what the research found, what I propose, and what I need from you and Jon.

Decide first

Seven items. Two are settled; the rest need you or Jon before I write the Word draft.

Take five old decks offline

Needs you

They're on a public (if hard-to-guess) link and overstate what's been done. Check them first:

Investor E and Corporate D are clean. They can stay, or move behind the password with everything else.

Sign off the plan outline

Needs you

Nine sections and an appendix, about six pages. See Plan outline.

Team details for the org chart

Needs you

Anna's role, or I leave her off for now. Surnames for Andrew and Anna. One line each on Jon, Shaz, Andrew, Anna and you. And confirm Shaz and Andrew are advisors, not founders: deck E calls all five founders.

The invested-to-date lines

Needs you

Are you happy with the conservative "avoided cost" figure plus a founder-time line? Any cash spent to add: servers, Apple fees, tools, AI subscriptions, the film?

Pick the homepage for the preview

Needs you

The approved August page, or one of the six September variants. See Website preview.

Website and pack on preview.ela.now, behind a password

Agreed

Agreed today. I'll build it once the homepage and pack contents are settled.

Numbers and deal terms

For Jon

Eight questions, listed in Questions for Jon. I'll also leave them as comments in the Word draft so writing can start before he answers.

Three flags

Old decks on a public link claim a pen test that never happened

Nobody has pen-tested ELA. In May the automated build pipeline wrote a fake pen-test report and fake drill logs into the repo, and some of the August decks repeated them. I checked the live pages today:

DeckWhat it says
Investor A, B and C"Independent pen-test"
Corporate"the pen-test report" and a May tabletop drill "rehearsed in the recorded" log
Investor D"~2.5-FTE-equivalent team" (that was the future team size, not the build)

After the decks come down, the repo needs the same cleanup: relabel or delete the pen-test report and its PDF (naming "Crescent Shield Security Consulting"), the 8 May drill entries in 16 runbooks, the on-call vendor document (naming "Nightwatch Response Services"), and the items ticked off in spec/README.md that don't exist.

Shaz's notes were in the 31 July plan all along

The red "Hi Chaps, a few points below" list sits at the top of the 31 July plan, which Jon's slides call v3. Word records Shaz Khan as the last person to save it, on 10 August. The copy you put in /tmp is byte-identical to the one I recovered from the Mac's temp folder. It's v3 rather than v1: v2 is Jon's 27 July draft.

Jon's documents disagree with each other

  • The summary slides give gross revenue as 265.5m on slide 6 and 246m on slides 8 and 10.
  • The teaser's net profit of 261.88m should be 260.88m (265.5m minus 4.62m of costs).
  • The teaser takes insurance commission as 10% of the 300m premium pool (30m). The plan takes 10% of the insurer's result (10.5m in the base case). The plan needs one basis, agreed with Sukoon.

What we do with Shaz's feedback

My pick: all eight points stay, but compressed. The plan still ends up shorter than today's, because Jon's insurance claims model moves to an appendix.

Shaz asked forWhat we doWhere
Executive summary: how the concept was conceived (the need)A half-page summary up front. The origin story needs two or three sentences from Jon.Section 1
The evolution of the businessA short milestone strip with dates, not prose.Section 2
Sustainability: tech, insurance, operationsOne status table: built, signed, still pending.Section 2
Financial viability at the lowest and highest levelLow, base and high cases that actually change revenue, net of Apple's cut.Section 5
The management teamOrg chart, advisors and one-line bios.Section 6
SWOT: existing and potential competitorsA compact SWOT plus a short competitor scan. Legal Cover is the first local name.Section 8
Initial and extended raise, exit scenarioThe 7M ask and use of funds. An extended raise or exit goes in only if Jon has a view; I won't invent one.Section 9
Marketing routes to market: current and potential channelsA channel table, now versus next, with named targets marked as targets.Section 4

No competitor research exists in the repo yet. With your go, I'll run one research agent on it for the SWOT.

Plan outline

About six pages, bullets and tables, no long paragraphs. Still a Word document, restyled in the ELA light theme.

  1. Executive summaryThe need, what ELA is, where we are, the ask.
  2. Where we areMilestones since May, what works today, and what's left before launch: 4-6 weeks per the 22 September stock-take, with Twilio and the law-firm contract on the critical path.
  3. Business modelOne membership sold through the App Store (AED 24.99 a week, 79.99 a month or 749.99 a year), the insurance add-on (AED 3,000 per adult, bought after joining), and a referral commission on legal fees.
  4. Routes to marketCorporates, SMEs, embassies and individuals, plus employee-wellbeing providers, legal creators, and travel insurers or premium cards.
  5. FinancialsLow, base and high cases net of VAT and Apple's commission, and the year-one budget.
  6. TeamOrg chart, advisors, and the delivery team we need.
  7. Invested to dateWhat was built, what a conventional team would have cost, and founder time.
  8. Risks and competitionA compact SWOT and the competitors that matter.
  9. The raiseThe AED 7M ask and what it pays for.
  10. AppendixJon's insurance terms and claims model, and the country roll-out.

Numbers to fix

These are corrections, not modelling choices.

Membership: show it net of Apple

The plan's flat 750 a year becomes the App Store prices. Net per member per year, after 5% UAE VAT and then Apple's commission:

Plan and priceGross a yearNet at 30%Net at 15%
WeeklyAED 24.991,3048691,056
MonthlyAED 79.99960640777
AnnualAED 749.99750500607

Apple takes 30% until the Small Business Program is approved (you re-applied on 20 September), then 15%. Seats sold to companies by contract don't go through the App Store, so Apple's cut applies only to people who subscribe themselves. Source: the App Store runbook in the repo.

The rest

  • Insurance premium: AED 3,000 per adult (Sukoon, confirmed 14 August), not 2,000.
  • Insurance commission: one basis, either 10% of premiums or 10% of the insurer's result, once agreed with Sukoon.
  • Scenarios: today all three cases total 246M, because subscriptions stay at 300,000 × 750 in each. The low and high subscriber numbers need to flow into revenue. The litigation-fee rows also mirror the insurance rows in reverse, which looks like a spreadsheet slip.
  • Product status: "prototype app" becomes "working product on TestFlight, running end to end on our production servers in test mode".
  • Remove every pen-test and drill claim.

Invested to date

Two different numbers answer "what have we put in". The plan should show both.

41-55
person-months: what a conventional team, without AI tools, would have needed to build what works today. About seven specialists for six to eight months.
AED 0.8-1.1M
that effort at our own budget rate of AED 20k per person-month (USD 220-300k).
About 5 months
of your time directing AI agents, 7 May to 27 September. At a senior UAE tech lead's cost, about AED 0.16-0.26M.

What was built

  • An iPhone app with an Apple Watch companion and lock-screen live updates.
  • A dispatch engine that works through the consulate, a law firm and a trusted contact while tracking the member's location. Messages are simulated until Twilio is live.
  • An operations console for the response team.
  • Apple in-app purchase and Stripe payments, in sandbox and test mode.
  • Production and staging servers, with health-checked deploys and automatic rollback.
  • About 2,760 automated tests. Proven end to end on production in test mode with TestFlight build 99, 20-22 September.

How the number was built

StepPerson-months
Bottom-up estimate, costed feature by feature (Opus build agent)49-66
Minus marketing, double counts, unproven features and AI-drafted documents; plus rework a buyer would have to fund (Opus sceptic)41-55

Which rate to quote

RatePer person-monthBuild valueUse
Our budget rate: AED 600k ÷ 12 months ÷ 2.5 peopleAED 20kAED 0.8-1.1MQuote this
The partner's implied rate: AED 189 an hourabout AED 30kAED 1.2-1.7MIf asked
UAE in-house, fully loadedabout AED 34kAED 1.9-2.1MDon't quote

Why the lowest: if we value the build at UAE rates, an investor will ask why the plan's AED 600k tech budget buys 2.5 people at well under that rate. And why "2.5 people for 3.5 months" was low: that's about 9 person-months. The 2.5 was the size of the future dev team in the August partner scope, never the build.

Proposed wording for the plan
  • Built May to September 2026 by our COO directing AI coding agents: an iPhone app with an Apple Watch companion, a dispatch server, an operations console and payments, running end to end on our production servers in test mode.
  • A conventional team would have needed about 41-55 person-months to build what works today: AED 0.8-1.1M at our own budget rate. This is avoided cost, not cash spent.
  • Founder time invested so far: about five months of the COO's time, plus cash spent of AED [to confirm].

Commits fall on only 64 separate days, because AI agents did the typing. Phrased as "what a conventional team would have needed", the figure holds up if someone checks the repo.

Team and dev resources

A draft org chart for the plan, and the delivery team the August partner scope asked for.

Jonathan SimpsonChief Executive Officer
Stevan LitobacChief Operating Officer
Development partnerUnder evaluation
24/7 response deskPlanned, outsourced

Advisors

  • Shaz Khan Advisor
  • Andrew Advisor, surname to add
  • Anna Role to confirm, or left off

Dashed boxes are not signed yet. The version in the plan will show only confirmed roles.

The delivery team we need

RoleLoadCovers
Lead engineer (full-stack TypeScript, a named person)Full time, about 160 h a monthApp and watch (with AI tools), server, database, admin console, releases
Backup engineer pool40 h a month, guaranteedCover for the lead, on-call
DevOpsAbout 25 h a month from day oneMonitoring, alerts, backups, deploys
UI designerAbout 25 h a month, 60 around launchApp screens and marketing design, not strategy
Project coordinationAbout 15 h a monthPlanning, keeping documentation current
First-line supportRetainer from soft launch24/7 desk trained on our runbooks

A second full-time engineer starts at whichever comes first: 90 days after soft launch, about 2,000 members, or two months running above 120% of planned hours.

Reality check on the AED 600k

Those hours add up to about 1.7 full-time people, not 2.5. AED 600k a year across them is AED 189 an hour (about €45), which only works at the discounted rate a partner offers in exchange for equity. At normal Romanian senior agency rates (€55-75 an hour) the same hours cost AED 0.73-0.99M a year, before the support desk and on-call.

Three deal structures that don't agree

WhoseStructure
Yours (15 August scope)AED 600k cash at the partner's discounted rate. Anything above it, and the second engineer, paid in equity.
Robert and Dan (15 August call)Services aren't billed: the team is their equity investment. They promised two rate cards, normal and equity-partner, but never quoted.
Jon (19 August document)The partner covers AED 1.91M of the year-one budget in kind: servers and tech support (700k), the Helios agency and social ads (960k), personnel and D&O insurance (250k).

The plan can state only one, and that's for you and Jon. No quote has come back since 15 August, and the four due-diligence checks are still open: Robert's identity and investment company, Tarabos's DIFC licence number, how many of their people are employees, and a walkthrough of React Native apps they've shipped. In the plan I'd show the role table under "development partner, part cash, part equity, under evaluation", without naming the firm.

Advisor pack

On preview.ela.now/pack, behind one shared password, as agreed. One link and one password that you can change any time, and advisors can pass both on. If you later want to know who opened it, the same page can switch to email codes (Cloudflare Access) without changing the link.

Ready now

Poster frame from the ELA launch film: 'Everything else is ours now' beside a phone showing a live case
Launch film, 16:9, 44.8 seconds, signed off today. Watch on the film board.

Needs a pass first

  • Business planThis update, as PDF and Word.
  • One-page teaserRebuilt from the new plan; the current one has old figures.
  • Investor deck E, as PDFAfter five fixes: the "Help is on the way" cover line, "on TestFlight, August", the team roles, the pricing, and the clock on the watch images.
  • Film in 9:16 and 4:5Rendered today, awaiting sign-off.
  • Website previewSee the next section.

New, worth making

  • Product walkthrough, 60-90 secondsCaptioned, cut from the existing app recordings. About half a day.
  • Screenshot set8-10 framed phone and watch screens. One to two hours.
  • What works today, what's leftA one-page status sheet. About an hour.
  • Team pageBios and photos, once we have the bios.
ELA home screen: You're protected, with the hold-to-arm button
Home, ready to arm
Live case timeline: case opened, law firm, consulate, trusted contact and response team
Live case timeline
Case chat with the ELA response team, including a voice note
Chat with the response team
Current screens from the film recordings (27-30 September): the starting point for the screenshot set.

Leave out: the armings map (it holds real GPS trails from test phones), internal release reports, QA boards, and decks A-D. The film's end card says "Available on iPhone and Apple Watch". That's fine inside a private pack, but hold public posting until the App Store listing is live.

Website preview

It goes on preview.ela.now behind the same password. First, pick the page.

The approved August page

Stale: the retired three-tier pricing (750, 3,750 and 7,500), old gold-era videos, "Coming soon", and a signup form that goes nowhere.

The 24 September round

Six variants. The reviewer ranked D and A highest (6.7 each). All six still carry the retired pricing, dead buttons and placeholder links.

My suggestion: D's hero with A's hold ring, rewritten for the single membership. Then current prices, mint footage from the film recordings, no "Al Noor" or "15 minutes" captures, and working links. About half a day to a day, then your review. ela.now's DNS is already on Cloudflare, so preview.ela.now is a small addition. The password is checked on Cloudflare's side, so nothing can be read without it.

Launch outreach

Ahmed Odeh (@lawbyodeh)
Dubai lawyer at MIO & Partners with about 420K TikTok followers and UAE-law explainers. He promotes Legal Cover, a UAE legal-advice subscription from AED 95 a month that covers "police matters". Check for an exclusive tie before pitching, and position ELA as the emergency layer they don't have.
Lyra Wellbeing
Lyra Health MENA (formerly ICAS), a Dubai-based employee-assistance provider with 24/7 crisis support for employers. Offer ELA inside their crisis packages: a partner-led way into the corporate channel.
The list
~/dev/ela-docs/launch-outreach-list.md on the devbox. I'll keep adding the names you give me. Legal Cover also goes into the plan's competitor section.

Questions for Jon

I'll also leave these as comments in the Word draft.

  1. How did the idea start?Two or three sentences for the executive summary.
  2. Subscriber casesKeep 100k, 300k and 500k for year one, or revise? The advisers on the 10 August call thought 300,000 was high. Your 28 July notes suggested 7k, 20k and 45k.
  3. Member mixThe split between weekly, monthly and annual members, and how many seats will be sold to companies by contract.
  4. Insurance commissionWhat percentage, and on what basis: premiums or the insurer's result? What stage are the Sukoon terms at?
  5. The raiseIs it still AED 7M, and in what form? Any view on an extended raise or exit?
  6. Dev partnerWhich structure goes in the plan: the 600k envelope or the 1.91M in-kind contribution?
  7. Budget linesWho is the Helios AI Agency (AED 480k), and who are the board fees (AED 480k) for?
  8. Legal entityIs there one yet, and where is it licensed? The App Store account also has to move from Individual to Organization before launch.

Building from the devbox

Works here
All code, tests and TestFlight builds: just ship builds on Expo's Macs. One-time setup: log in to Expo on the devbox with npx eas-cli login.
Needs the Mac
The iOS and watch simulators. I can drive them over ssh and send you screenshots.
Test on your iPhone
A development build that loads code from the devbox over Tailscale, so edits reload on your phone anywhere. Needs a device build profile, your phone registered with eas device:create, and Tailscale on the phone. Watch and Live Activity changes still need a TestFlight build.
Android
No emulator here. Cloud-built APKs on BrowserStack, or a real phone.
Before switching
The devbox copy of the repo is 681 commits behind, and the Mac holds two unpushed commits and 29 changed files.

Versions and sources

How the plan evolved

  1. Jon's v2 draft: a 1,750 AED placeholder price, no costs.
  2. Your review and meeting notes.
  3. Jon's v3: 750 AED, three revenue streams, a year-one budget, the 7M raise.
  4. Shaz adds his red list to v3.
  5. v3 with Shaz's notes reaches your Mac.
  6. Jon edits the teaser and the summary slides.
  7. This update starts.

Where everything is

On the devbox, in ~/dev/ela-docs/2026-09-30-plan-update/: source/ holds every Word, PowerPoint and deck file, including v3 with Shaz's notes; extracted/ holds text versions; research/ holds the five agent reports.

How this was researched

Five Opus 5.5 agents on max effort, about 48 minutes:

  • a search of your Mac's Claude chats, memory, and the Granola notes of the 10 and 15 August calls;
  • an inventory of films, decks, website drafts and screenshots;
  • salary and rate benchmarks from Robert Walters 2026, Charterhouse 2026, Hays GCC 2025, Cooper Fitch 2025 and Hays Romania 2025;
  • a bottom-up estimate of the build;
  • a sceptical review of that estimate.

Limits: only the last month of Mac chats survives, and ssh can't read the Mac's Downloads, Documents or Desktop.